OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG UNOPPOSED MOTION ROLL FOR 22 APRIL 2022. BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUDGE: WRIGHT J JUGDES’ SECRETARY: [email protected] 1. KINDLY TAKE NOTE THAT WRIGHT J WILL HEAR BELOW LISTED MATTERS VIRTUAL OVER MS TEAMS @10:00am. 2. Draft order/s in word format should be sent/emailed to Ms Vukeya at least day before hearing and all edited/amended draft order/s by judge’s direction should be emailed/sent during or after proceedings. See link below. Microsoft Teams meeting Join on your computer or mobile app Click here to join the meeting Learn More | Meeting options Practitioners are advised to have their case types properly classified (refer to paragraph 96 of C/D) in date requests forms & computerized notices of set down. No case type must be classified as ‘’Other” without specifying in line with the Uniform Rules of Court. 1. SABELO MOSES MSIMANGO vs THE MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG BHEKI MARCUS MKHIZE vs BERNICE CHARITY MKHIZE UNOPPOSED (VARIATION OF DIVORCE ORDER) BYRNE GREGORY BRIAN vs BYRNE ZASKIA 2021/59390 Email Hidden V 2014/04654 Email Hidden O 2020/19755 [email protected] T 2020/34218 [email protected] F 5. CITY OF EKURHULENI MUNICIPALITY vs KOSI DUMEZWENI MCUBE MARCELLO CECCHIN 2021/46374 [email protected] O 6. SARAH PEACE EVANS vs FARREN WINSTON QUEBIN COLLINS 2021/50760 [email protected] O 7. 2022/8673 [email protected] EP 8. ITHEMBA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (PTY) LTD vs MURATHI CHARMAIN AND 3 OTHERS TSHABALALA, MACKSON 2018/16252 [email protected] O 9. IPS INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD vs ALLSTREAM (PTY) LTD & OTHERS 2022/10880 [email protected] EP 10. SA BLOCK (PTY) LTD vs FERDALE MARKETING CC 2021/36887 [email protected] FL 11. MTSITSINI, NOMUSA & 1 OTHER vs THEMINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES & 2 OTHERS TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES (SA) LIMITED vs MR VICTOR MANYENGE CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY vs MOHAMED YUSUF AHME NEDBANK LIMITED vs CHANTELLE ESTERHUIZEN 2021/55788 [email protected] V 2020/13564 m[email protected] O 2020/42381 [email protected] I 2021/19425 [email protected] S MATHEBULA, PRUDENCE vs DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS; THE MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG; MOLEFE, DINEO; MASINDA, LINDA JOHANNES; SELWANE, GOITSEONE; MAHLANGU, REFILWE; MAHLANGU, GONTSE BRIDGET MFC (A DIVISION OF NEDBANK LIMITED) vs MUSGROVE CAROL 2020/26219 [email protected] O 2021/2789 [email protected] O 2. 3. 4. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Practitioners are advised to have their case types properly classified (refer to paragraph 96 of C/D) in date requests forms & computerized notices of set down. No case type must be classified as ‘’Other” without specifying in line with the Uniform Rules of Court. 17. ADELE FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED vs MASULUBELA; L 2019/40008 [email protected] AV 18. NEDBANK LIMITED vs GACHUNGA; G.K. 2021/3152 [email protected] D 19. NEDBANK LIMITED vs KUBHEKA; S.B. 2021/11613 [email protected] D 20. NEDBANK LIMITED vs MATUKANE; M.B. 2021/27933 [email protected] D 21. NEDBANK LIMITED vs MOLEFE; N. 2021/ 8651 [email protected] D 22. NEDBANK LIMITED vs NODADA; P.N. 2021/38507 [email protected] D 23. NEDBANK LIMITED vs TSHITSHA; N.T. 2021/ 37924 [email protected] D 24. BRIDGE TAXI FINANCE GJ (PTY) LTD vs SEKOBO; MATOME, PETRUS BRIDGE TAXI FINANCE NO 02 (PTY) LTD vs KHUMALO; KHULULIWE, MANDISA BRIDGE TAXI FINANCE NO 02 (PTY) LTD vs NGOBESE; KHULEKANI, SABELO DARRYL ACKERMAN ATTORNEYS vs MITESH BHAWAN & IRVAN CLINTON CLIVE DAMON DAVID WAYNE PRESTON HODNETT & MARGOT LYNNE HODNETT - In re: MEGAN ANNE HODNETT PRESMOOI (PTY) LTD vs MAKHANYA, SITHABILE THEMBISILE & ANOTHER DE BRUYN-CLOETE M vs CLOETE D 2021/52033 [email protected] T 2021/52342 [email protected] T 2021/52190 [email protected] T 2021/53620 [email protected] O 2022/517 [email protected] GF 2022/10878 [email protected] EP 2021/53348 [email protected] O UREN (Born Jardine), MAREE-LOUISE THERESA vs UREN, ANTHONY GAVIN HORN A T/A HORN GARDEN SERVICES vs FERREIRA H 2021/21300 [email protected] T 2020/3780 [email protected] FS 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Practitioners are advised to have their case types properly classified (refer to paragraph 96 of C/D) in date requests forms & computerized notices of set